Tampilkan postingan dengan label Republicans. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Republicans. Tampilkan semua postingan

Rabu, 01 Februari 2012

Merit-Based Workers Compensation: The Romney-Gingrich Plan

The Republican presidential primary battle has inadequately defined the debate guidelines for the future of workers' compensation in the US. While both leading Republican candidates are throwing darts at each other on many points, the basic philosophy of both Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich is to extinguish the so-called "entitlement society." They claim Barack Obama, "the food stamp president," has accelerated the problem. 


Of course, missing from the debate is that fact that the US has changed, in tandem, with the rest of the world. The nation's manufacturing sector left the auditorium, and with it went jobs and premiums for supporting a viable workers' compensation system. What it left was a legacy of industrial illness and disease that is fatally affecting the nation's medical delivery system and burdening the taxpayers of our nation.


If the political debate is to become credible, the medical treatment delivery system must be addressed rather than just throwing around meaningless political rhetoric. While the safety net is slowing deteriorating, there remains still an opportunity to re-design and advance a credible workers' compensation system. If the debate continues along the present path, the opportunity will be lost and the nation will loose.


See The Republican Myth Of Obama’s “Entitlement Society” By Robert Reich
"But they have cause and effect backwards. The reason for the rise in food stamps, unemployment insurance, and other safety-net programs is Americans got clobbered in 2008 with the worst economic catastrophe since the Great Depression. They and their families have needed whatever helping hands they could get."
.....
For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman  1.973.696.7900  jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses. 

Rabu, 13 April 2011

Wisconsin and Workers' Comp "Reform"



Guest Blog by Thomas M. Domer  


Headlines screaming for “Workers’ Comp Reform” are blaring in many states (CA,FL, NY, OH, NC, and most recently IL). In Illinois, the state’s much-criticized system is under fire and legislation to totally dismantle the system is proposed. Wisconsin has thus far managed to dodge partisan efforts to scrap the system due in large part to the stabilizing effect of the Wisconsin Workers’ Comp Advisory Council. The Wisconsin Worker's Compensation Advisory Council was created in 1975 to advise the Department and legislature on policy matters concerning the development and administration of the workers' compensation law. The Council aims to maintain the overall stability of the workers' compensation system without regard to partisan changes in the legislative or executive branches of government. The Council provides a vehicle for labor and management representatives to play a direct role in recommending changes in the workers' compensation law to the legislature.

The council, composed of five labor, five management and three non-voting insurance members appointed by the secretary of the Department of Workforce Development and chaired by a department employee, meets regularly at different sites around Wisconsin. It occasionally assigns special topics to study committees on such issues as medical costs, permanent total disability rates and attorney's fees. The medical committee assigned in the mid-1990's to report on minimum permanency percentages for surgical procedures, for example, issued its findings which resulted in the schedule contained in the Administrative Code.

The Council obtains input from various workers' compensation constituents including interested members of the legal, medical, labor, management, insurance and employer communities. Public hearings on proposed changes are held, followed by Advisory Council deliberations. The Council has always produced an “agreed upon bill” which results in annual changes in benefit rates and substantive law. The bill proceeds to the Labor Committees in the Wisconsin Assembly and Senate where, after passage, the Governor signs the bill into law. (Republican Governor Scott Walker’s recent attempt to eviscerate public sector bargaining, which prompted the infamous flight to Illinois of the “Wisconsin 14” Democratic Senators, has had a “spillover” affect even on the Council. Labor members, in response to the Governor’s union-busting efforts, have boycotted the last 2 Council meetings).


Thomas M. Domer practices in Milwaukee, Wisconsin (www.domerlaw.com). He has authored and edited several publications including the legal treatise Wisconsin Workers' Compensation Law (West) and he is the Editor of the national publication, Workers' First Watch. Tom is past chair of the Workers' Compensation Section of the American Association for Justice. He is a charter Fellow in the College of Workers' Compensation Lawyers. He co-authors the nationally recognized Wisconsin Workers' Compensation Experts Blog.

Senin, 04 April 2011

The Republican Plan: Just End Medicare

This week, the Republicans will offer a proposal that ultimately would end Medicare involvement. The plain is simply end Medicare. The proposal outlined is outlined in the Wall Street Journal today.

"The plan would essentially end Medicare, which now pays most of the health-care bills for 48 million elderly and disabled Americans, as a program that directly pays those bills. Mr. Ryan and other conservatives say this is necessary because of the program's soaring costs. Medicare cost $396.5 billion in 2010 and is projected to rise to $502.8 billion in 2016. At that pace, spending on the program would have doubled between 2002 and 2016."

Converting the program for coverage to the poor only would still not end the plans' involvement in workers' compensation and in fact may only increase it. The dichotomy between rich and poor will increase. The numbers of uninsured are growing as well as the working elderly.

It is anticipated that Medicare premium costs will continue to increase under the present plan and wealthy Americans will opt-out. This proposal will merely mean a universal opt-out plan leaving the Federal program strapped for cash. The premium base needs to be increased rather than diminished.

As Peter Rousmaniere, a noted workers' compensation commentator,  recently observed, the workers' compensation program has "leaks in the system."  Occupational disease claims will continue to be denied at increasing rates, and the cost shifting will merely be perpetuated from workers compensation  to the taxpayers. Just ending Medicare will not solve the problems with the Workers' Compensation medical delivery system.